Alternative Therapies and MedicinesAnswer to Last Week's Question: They have been persecuted for the last half millennium, beginning in the Middle Ages with the general fear of witches and continuing well past the Salem witch trials. Thousands were killed and imprisoned under Stalin and Hitler in the 20th Century, and they are still discriminated today in many countries.
This week we continued our discussion of alternative therapies and medicines. The most recent film we watched concerned "Bee Venom" therapies used to treat Multiple Sclerosis. While these were unorthodox, they are currently being researched for their effectiveness. If they ultimately have a positive effect for someone who is suffering from this debilitating disease, why shouldn't they be allowed? It is unethical to limit society's medical options, however, it is also unethical to allow them to go untested and to not warn the population of the potential dangers. The FDA should regulate alternative medicine just as it does traditional treatments. The same rules apply. If they work and are safe, than they are allowed. If not, than they are rejected. The consumer must be kept safe at all costs. "Regulate" in the context of the involvement of the FDA, in my opinion, has a positive connotation, as I always know that my food and medicine has been proven safe. In fact, if a treatment is effective, the FDA's approval will not only spread awareness, but it will increase public trust of the treatment, thereby insuring that it will reach more struggling patients.
However, the "Bee Venom" therapies, if proven effective, could be an anomaly, as it is more often true that these alternative medicines are simply not effective or they are even harmful to some. The effectiveness of a medical treatment will always improve its legitimacy. However, if one effective trial comes at the price of ten harmful ones, the situation changes. For example, it may be the most potent, effective cancer treatment available in successful trials, but if nine out of every ten patients die in the process, the treatment is no longer viable. Ultimately whether these potentially harmful or effective treatments are regulated it depends on the type of government and economy you have, but in a perfect world, it should not, as governments should always care for their people and should always lookout for their well being. We do not live in a perfect world.


